Jing-Jing Lu vs Qianhui Tang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Lu vs Q. Tang

Jing-Jing Lu
CHN
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
36
Age
25
-
Height
-
839
C. Rank
818
159
Best Rank
617
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$63.3K
Career Money
$1.9K
-
Plays
-

Qianhui Tang
CHN
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
36
Age
25
-
Height
-
839
C. Rank
818
159
Best Rank
617
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$63.3K
Career Money
$1.9K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Lu 2 - 0 Tang
They have played 4 sets in total, with Jing-Jing Lu winning 4 and Qianhui Tang winning 0. The last match between Jing-Jing Lu and Qianhui Tang was at the W15 Jakarta, 15-03-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jing-Jing Lu getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lu | 2 |
| Tang | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Jakarta(03-15-23)
Jing-Jing Lu
6
6
Qianhui Tang
3
2
(R1) Luan(05-24-17)
Jing-Jing Lu
6
6
Qianhui Tang
1
0
J. Lu vs Q. Tang H2H Profile
J. Lu vs Q. Tang Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jing-Jing Lu has won 31.25% of points on their second serve, while Qianhui Tang has won 35.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jing-Jing Lu, in recent form, has won 52.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Qianhui Tang has won 48.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.69% and 31.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jing-Jing Lu has saved 37.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Qianhui Tang has saved 43.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jing-Jing Lu has won 51.35% of matches played (W/L 19/18), with Qianhui Tang winning 27.27% (W/L 3/8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jing-Jing Lu has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 8/6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 39/38). Qianhui Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 66/64), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 15/20).
- Player level: In the last year, Jing-Jing Lu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 11/10), where as Qianhui Tang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 16.67% of matches (W/L 1/5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jing-Jing Lu winning 2 times and Qianhui Tang being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jing-Jing Lu winning 4 and Qianhui Tang winning 0.
- The last match between Jing-Jing Lu and Qianhui Tang was at the W15 Jakarta, 15-03-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Jing-Jing Lu getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jing-Jing Lu has played against opponents with an average rank of 559.38 while Qianhui Tang has played against players with an average rank of 427.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jing-Jing Lu has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Qianhui Tang has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jing-Jing Lu has converted 52.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Qianhui Tang has converted 35.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jing-Jing Lu vs Qianhui Tang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Lu vs Q. Tang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 6 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:19:0 | Average Match Time | 1:19:0 |
| 79% (98/124) | 1st Serve % | 65% (66/102) |
| 63% (62/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (28/66) |
| 42% (11/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (12/36) |
| 52% (12/23) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 61% (62/102) | Return Points Win % | 41% (51/124) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Lu 38%, Tang 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Lu 59%, Tang 58%.
Break Points Saved %: Lu 48%, Tang 49%.
J. Lu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q. Tang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-0 6-0 | ||

J. Lu vs Q. Tang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.66% (311/258) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.13% (85/88) |
| 53.42% (696/607) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.50% (202/198) |
| 51.59% (6175/5795) | Games Win/Loss | 51.62% (1877/1759) |
| 55.76% (247/196) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.77% (66/64) |
| 50.65% (39/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (15/20) |
| 48.57% (17/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 57.14% (8/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 374 | Aces Total | 196 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1355 | Total Double Faults | 329 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:10:33 |
| 594.28 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.48 |
| 64% (13447/20956) | 1st Serve % | 63% (5056/7976) |
| 60% (8002/13447) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (2981/5056) |
| 41% (3109/7509) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1258/2920) |
| 50% (1389/2791) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (487/1042) |
| 48% (9971/20854) | Return Points Win % | 46% (3769/8143) |
| 20.00% (3/12) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.28% (24/29) | Main Tour W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 57.37% (253/188) | Challenger W/L | 48.28% (56/60) |
| 55.10% (27/22) | Futures W/L | 54.90% (28/23) |
| 55% (303/554) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (84/169) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 45% (49/109) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (14/33) |
| 55% (98/179) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (22/52) |
| 88% (290/255) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (93/73) |
| 12% (290/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (93/20) |
| 20% (278/56) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (80/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 30 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 08:05 PM
PredictionSat, 29 Nov, 09:30 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 11:00 AM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 0-0
21:30
H2H 0-0
05:30
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
15:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Gwalior
India
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India